Combining several reasons for drug testing is the way to effectively avoid hiring drug-use prone applicants while still discouraging drug abuse among existing employees. Since many companies first started drug testing their employees in the late 1980s, drug get your test today among current employees has continued to decline. According to a recent report by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), an average of only 1% of new jobs requiring drug screening are currently being tested. However, given the prevalence of prescription drugs among employees and the relatively low cost of most tests, there is no reason for employers not to implement them.
The Increasing prevalence of Drug Testing at Work
Some people argue that the cost of drug testing makes it a poor use of resources. However, if this is true, then why are employers not screening everyone who applies? The cost of drug screening does not necessarily translate into increased drug testing costs. If employers choose to perform drug screening and drug testing as part of their routine background checks on new hires, they can obtain the same information for a fraction of the cost. For example, rather than paying a fee for each individual drug screen, all they need to do is schedule an entire session for an entire workplace full of employees.
Substance abuse testing is not for the purpose of determining if a prospective employee is “under the influence” of drugs. Nor should it be used to dismiss the possibility of occasional, infrequent use by legitimate employees. Instead, employers who wish to deter their employees from substance abuse and improve their work environments should implement drug testing as a part of their background check policy. Doing so will not only save the employer money but will set a good example for other businesses as well.